Re: speeding up planning with partitions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-02-08 06:51:43
Message-ID: 444ee0a1-6c60-88a6-f28a-c9c50ca03773@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tsunakawa-san,

On 2019/02/08 15:40, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> I'm afraid v20-0001 fails to apply to the current HEAD (precisely, ftp.postgresql.org/pub/snapshot/dev/postgresql-snapshot.tar.gz) Could you check it?

Hmm, I had rebased v20 over HEAD as of yesterday evening. CF bot seemed
to be happy with it too:

http://cfbot.cputube.org/amit-langote.html

Also, I rebased the patches again on the latest HEAD as of this morning
and there were no issues.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Iwata, Aya 2019-02-08 07:01:01 RE: libpq compression
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2019-02-08 06:48:32 ON SELECT rule on a table without columns