Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date: 2006-04-26 14:43:25
Message-ID: 444F870D.2000307@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


>While in general there may not be that much of a % difference between
the 2 chips,
>there's a huge gap in Postgres. For whatever reason, Postgres likes
Opterons.
>Way more than Intel P4-architecture chips.

It isn't only Postgres. I work on a number of other server applications
that also run much faster on Opterons than the published benchmark
figures would suggest they should. They're all compiled with gcc4,
so possibly there's a compiler issue. I don't run Windows on any
of our Opteron boxes so I can't easily compare using the MS compiler.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Stone 2006-04-26 14:43:49 Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework
Previous Message Junaili Lie 2006-04-26 14:27:13 Re: slow deletes on pgsql 7.4