| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com>, Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Catalog Access |
| Date: | 2006-04-25 18:57:13 |
| Message-ID: | 444E7109.5030507@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:25:35PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Is there anything in comments/docs/list archives about why catalog
>> access uses a bunch of 'magic' instead of treating catalog tables the
>> same as every other table? I realize that ultimately you have to
>> bootstrap somehow (kinda hard to read from pg_class if the info needed
>> to do so is in pg_class), but perhaps switching over to the regular
>> access methods after the system is up would be worth-while.
>
> I don't know if it's explicitly documented, but here's one mail that
> describes some of the issues:
>
> http://www.thelinuxreview.com/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00840.php
O.k. I need to fix that... that should be an archives link ;0
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00840.php
Martin how did you find that link with the linuxreview domain ?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-25 19:12:45 | Re: Catalog Access |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-04-25 18:40:13 | Re: Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP |