Re: Gborg still down

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gborg still down
Date: 2006-04-21 23:17:29
Message-ID: 44496809.1030001@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:41:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Most of the servers are not hosted by hub these days - we have them
>> pretty well distributed around the world these days.
>
> Well, wherever they're hosted monitoring has been an issue for as long
> as I can remember. Search not getting updated, list archives not
> updated, sites down, etc.

Well Search has been resolved as it was moved to us and has been kicking
arse since then. Archives has not had any server side problems in longer
then I can remember.

> If individuals hosting these various services aren't monitoring them
> adequately then the project itself should be monitoring them. Plus
> there's servers/services that I suspect won't get monitored very well by
> their owners (mirrors come to mind...)

It may be helpful to understand that a lot of the servers are mirrors
(like archives) and even if archives is doing just fine the source for
archives may be having problems (which has been the case).

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-04-21 23:24:57 Re: Major upcoming upgrade to postgresql.org ...
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-04-21 22:48:27 Re: Major upcoming upgrade to postgresql.org ...