From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Visual C++ 2005 |
Date: | 2006-04-21 19:37:48 |
Message-ID: | 4449348C.8030906@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
> I'm not so sure it's a problem - from Visual Studio's redist.txt:
>
> For your convenience, we have provided the following folders for use
> when redistributing VC++ runtime files. Subject to the license terms for
> the software, you may redistribute the folder (unmodified) in the
> application local folder as a sub-folder with no change to the folder
> name.
Sounds like distri bloating, for no benefit.
Best would be if this manifest stuff could be omitted totally; we
probably could link to the old msvcrt then.
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-04-21 20:28:13 | Re: Visual C++ 2005 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-04-21 19:37:34 | Re: Visual C++ 2005 |