From: | tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
Date: | 2019-07-04 10:22:21 |
Message-ID: | 4447fb6d-b308-3914-0f6b-d2eb5f7ca56d@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/01/2019 11:04 AM, Amit Khandekar wrote:
> Also, in the updated patch (v11), I have added some scenarios that
> verify that slot is dropped when either master wal_level is
> insufficient, or when slot is conflicting. Also organized the test
> file a bit.
One scenario where replication slot removed even after fixing the
problem (which Error message suggested to do)
Please refer this below scenario
Master cluster-
postgresql,conf file
wal_level=logical
hot_standby_feedback = on
port=5432
Standby cluster-
postgresql,conf file
wal_level=logical
hot_standby_feedback = on
port=5433
both Master/Slave cluster are up and running and are in SYNC with each other
Create a logical replication slot on SLAVE ( SELECT * from
pg_create_logical_replication_slot('m', 'test_decoding'); )
change wal_level='hot_standby' on Master postgresql.conf file / restart
the server
Run get_changes function on Standby -
postgres=# select * from pg_logical_slot_get_changes('m',null,null);
ERROR: logical decoding on standby requires wal_level >= logical on master
Correct it on Master postgresql.conf file ,i.e set wal_level='logical'
again / restart the server
and again fire get_changes function on Standby -
postgres=# select * from pg_logical_slot_get_changes('m',null,null);
*ERROR: replication slot "m" does not exist
*This looks little weird as slot got dropped/removed internally . i
guess it should get invalid rather than removed automatically.
Lets user's delete the slot themself rather than automatically removed
as a surprise.
--
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2019-07-04 10:27:54 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2019-07-04 09:52:22 | Re: Excessive memory usage in multi-statement queries w/ partitioning |