| From: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zahir Lalani <zahir(at)systemz(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: the integer type |
| Date: | 2006-04-13 16:24:54 |
| Message-ID: | 443E7B56.5070408@amsoftwaredesign.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Zahir Lalani wrote:
> This is exactly how I felt - It made me wonder whether I should go back
> to MS SQL - the whole UI experience is much better.
>
> But now that I have seen lightning - hopefully it will get easier. Also,
> I was trying to connect this to ColdFusion/Dreamweaver.
> Since the field was defined as int4, Coldfusion raised an error in its
> validation as it had no clue what int4 was?
>
> Zahir
>
>
PG Lightning Admin was created with input from several MS SQL server
DBAs who just absolutely detested pgAdmin III.
We where converting a large MS SQL application to Postgresql and they
complained to me every day about pgAdmin, so I started writing PG
Lightning admin for them and it took
off from there. If you have never used a RDBMS before, pgAdmin III is
acceptable, but once you have used tools like the MS Query Analyser or
even commercial admin tools for Firebird (IB expert for example) it
(pgAdmin) really starts to lose it's luster.
I admit my views on this subject are biased though :-)
--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql
Your best bet for Postgresql Administration
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zahir Lalani | 2006-04-13 16:52:52 | Re: the integer type |
| Previous Message | Zahir Lalani | 2006-04-13 16:02:47 | Re: the integer type |