From: | John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is a high tab_reloid worrying? |
Date: | 2006-04-13 14:02:07 |
Message-ID: | 443E59DF.5080301@wardbrook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the reassurance. You're right the db has been around for a while.
Doea anyone know if OIDs for data and system (DDL) objects from the same
number generator?
John
Christopher Browne wrote:
> In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com (John Sidney-Woollett) transmitted:
>
>>I just added a new table to a slony relication set. The new table
>>seems to have a really high tab_reloid value of 94,198,669
>
>
> I presume the database instance has been around for a while? If so,
> then I wouldn't worry too much.
>
> I'm not certain comprehensively what would consume OIDs, but I expect
> temp tables would, so if you have applications that generate them,
> that would naturally lead to increases in OID values.
>
> The only time you get *low* values is if you define tables immediately
> after creating the database.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | chris smith | 2006-04-13 14:10:56 | Re: posting request |
Previous Message | Zahir Lalani | 2006-04-13 13:27:44 | the integer type |