Re: Is a high tab_reloid worrying?

From: John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is a high tab_reloid worrying?
Date: 2006-04-13 14:02:07
Message-ID: 443E59DF.5080301@wardbrook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for the reassurance. You're right the db has been around for a while.

Doea anyone know if OIDs for data and system (DDL) objects from the same
number generator?

John

Christopher Browne wrote:
> In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com (John Sidney-Woollett) transmitted:
>
>>I just added a new table to a slony relication set. The new table
>>seems to have a really high tab_reloid value of 94,198,669
>
>
> I presume the database instance has been around for a while? If so,
> then I wouldn't worry too much.
>
> I'm not certain comprehensively what would consume OIDs, but I expect
> temp tables would, so if you have applications that generate them,
> that would naturally lead to increases in OID values.
>
> The only time you get *low* values is if you define tables immediately
> after creating the database.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chris smith 2006-04-13 14:10:56 Re: posting request
Previous Message Zahir Lalani 2006-04-13 13:27:44 the integer type