| From: | John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Slony-I Mailing List <slony1-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Slony1-general] Is a high tab_reloid worrying? |
| Date: | 2006-04-13 10:19:15 |
| Message-ID: | 443E25A3.7040301@wardbrook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
My tables are defined "WITHOUT OID" - does that make a difference?
John
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2006-04-13 kell 10:06, kirjutas John
> Sidney-Woollett:
>
>>I just added a new table to a slony relication set. The new table seems
>>to have a really high tab_reloid value of 94,198,669
>
> ...
>
>>Is this something I should be worried about? Can I find out where all
>>the intermediate OIDs have gone?
>
>
> probably to data rows, unless you have all your tables defined using
> WITHOUT OID. OIDs are assigned from a global "sequence".
>
> --------
> Hannu
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-04-13 10:25:27 | Re: corrupted item pointer:??? |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2006-04-13 09:35:52 | corrupted item pointer:??? |