From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alasdair Young <ayoung(at)vigilos(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Indexes slower when used in decending vs. ascending |
Date: | 2006-04-12 16:43:14 |
Message-ID: | 443D2E22.8080405@pinpointresearch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
> Um ... I work for Red Hat, so I think I have to slip you the bad news
> twice today: no sane person would still be running that OS version
> either. 7.2 was obsolete about the time I went to work at Red Hat
> (in 2001).
Sadly, some users are stuck. For instance if you have Dialogic D240SC/T1
Rev 1 cards then the latest drivers you can get are the 5.x and they are
very picky about kernel versions, streams libs, etc.
If you want to build a supported system, you must start with Red Hat
7.2/7.3 and must, among other detailed steps, apply specific kernel
patches. Or you can go through a similar set of steps on Windows. I'll
take Linux - even an old version.
Fortunately I have it on authority of an Intel employee that they will
be open-sourcing the Dialogic drivers sometime in the next year so over
time this problem will probably disappear.
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alasdair Young | 2006-04-12 18:15:40 | Re: Indexes slower when used in decending vs. ascending order? |
Previous Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2006-04-12 15:30:47 | Re: Removing Tsearch2 |