Re: plpgsql by default

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default
Date: 2006-04-11 08:07:04
Message-ID: 443B63A8.3020603@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> On 2006-04-11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't feel a need to offer specific examples as requested by Andrew.
>
> Why not? You're basing your entire argument on a false premise (that
> pl/pgsql is more powerful than SQL); I can provide specific examples of
> why this is not the case, or refute any that you care to provide.

You can write trigger functions in plpgsql.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew - Supernews 2006-04-11 08:37:33 Re: plpgsql by default
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-04-11 07:31:44 Question on win32 semaphore simulation