From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: Fix optimization of foreign-key on update actions |
Date: | 2019-03-18 17:02:52 |
Message-ID: | 44392660-4813-d306-e8b8-f22f67a9f9a1@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-11 12:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-02-06 23:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 05/02/2019 17:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What I *don't* like about the proposed patch is that it installs a
>>> new, different comparison rule for the ON UPDATE CASCADE case only.
>>> If we were to go in this direction, I'd think we should try to use
>>> the same comparison rule for all FK row comparisons.
>>
>> That's easy to change. I had it like that in earlier versions of the
>> patch. I agree it would be better for consistency, but it would create
>> some cases where we do unnecessary extra work.
>
> Updated patch with this change made, and some conflicts resolved.
Committed like this.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-03-18 17:17:00 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2019-03-18 16:53:22 | Concurrency bug with vacuum full (cluster) and toast |