From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor |
Date: | 2006-04-06 16:56:24 |
Message-ID: | 44354838.4030500@tada.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hear hear ;-)
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>> On 4/6/06, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I have written some experimental code of doing master-slave seqscan in
>>> PostgreSQL. During the work, I feel we had enough infrastructure to
>>> support
>>> parallel query execution.
>>>
>>
>> Great work! I had looked into this a little bit and came to the same
>> ideas/problems you did, but none of them seemed insurmountable at all.
>> I'd be interested in working with you on this if you'd like.
>>
>> I'm interested in hearing Tom's suggestions on this topic too.
>>
>>
>
> From time to time there is (often ill-informed) discussion about making
> postgres multi-threaded - this strikes me as a possible candidate area
> for multithreading, and maybe that would be a way to overcome some of
> the problems mentioned.
>
> Just a thought
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2006-04-07 02:18:24 | Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2006-04-06 16:39:37 | Re: Summer of Code Preparation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Brant | 2006-04-06 16:58:22 | pgstat: remove delayed destroy / pipe: socket error fix |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-04-06 14:41:15 | Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor |