| From: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Juan Casero (FL FLC)" <Juan(dot)Casero(at)wholefoods(dot)com> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
| Date: | 2006-04-06 04:15:45 |
| Message-ID: | 443495F1.2010302@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Juan Casero (FL FLC) wrote:
>I can't fully realize
>the performance benefits of the T2000 server unless and until I start
>getting lots of people hitting the database server with requests. This
>doesn't happen right now. It may happen later on as I write more
>applications for the server but I am looking to see if the performance
>benefit we can get from this server is worth the price tag right now.
>That is why I am looking for ways to tweak postgres on it.
>
>
>
If you have a need to use the system for other purposes with the extra
CPU bandwidth, you can partition it using the Solaris Containers
feature. Doing this will give you room to grow your DB usage later and
make full use of the system now.
Just a thought!
Regards,
Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leigh Dyer | 2006-04-06 04:23:07 | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
| Previous Message | Robert Lor | 2006-04-06 03:41:16 | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |