Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>
>>>Yes, but even the environment variables get me what I want. I
>>>therefore respectfully submit the attached patch to document them in
>>>the INSTALL file.
>>>
>>>
>>It seems rather pointless to document two instances of what is in fact
>>a generic autoconf-script behavior ...
>>
>>
>
>The problem is that PostgreSQL is moving out of the realm of "hard-core
>geeks only" and more into the mainstream. I'd bet a number of our users
>have very little idea how autoconf and it's progeny work. It's probably
>not unlikely that those folks would be able to figure out where their
>perl was, but then not know how to tell it to configure.
>
>

Most such users would use a binary distribution, though - either from
the OS supplier or from our collection of binaries. If people are going
to build postgres themselves from source then I *do* expect them to be
moderately hard-core geeks.

cheers

andrew