Re: PSQL Data Type: text vs. varchar(n)

From: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: kurt _ <kjs216(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PSQL Data Type: text vs. varchar(n)
Date: 2006-03-31 03:04:10
Message-ID: 442C9C2A.5010900@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

kurt _ wrote:
> I am having a problem with Sun Java Studio Creator because the latest
> version of the JDBC driver returns a field length of -1 for text fields.
>
> My question: Is a text field just a varchar(Integer.MAX_VALUE)? If I
> want to use the data binding part of the SJSC tool I will need to
> convert my text fields to some standard SQL data type. I understand
> that varchar just stores the actual length of the field, and not the
> padded white space. Would anyone recommend for or against creating a
> field of varchar(Integer.MAX_VALUE)? Will PostgreSQL choke on that? If
> against, how is text implemented and how can I represent a
> variable-length String in a SQL standard format?

varchar has a max of 255 characters, so yeh it'll choke using
integer.max_value.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/datatype-character.html
has details on how string fields are stored and the differences.

--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-31 04:09:39 Re: FAQ 1.1
Previous Message Chris 2006-03-31 02:59:01 Re: checking data type