From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, BERTHOULE Emmanuel <pgdev(at)manberth(dot)homeip(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL |
Date: | 2006-03-30 05:46:27 |
Message-ID: | 442B70B3.9000306@wildenhain.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> ISTM that the first requirement is for a sane API that will handle the
> fact that HBA lines are ordered. Persistence in itself shouldn't be a
> big problem - we already do that with some shared tables, iirc.
>
> so we might have some functions like:
>
> insert_hba_rule(at_position int, connection_type text, username text,
> dbname text, cidr_host text, method text)
> move_hba_rule(from_position int, to_position int)
> delete_hba_rule(at_position int)
>
> Inventing new SQL syntax might make things a bit tougher.
>
I dont think it has to be ordered preliminary. Since we are
dealing with subnets and stuff - the ordering already lays
in the data - just like routing tables work: most specific
matches first.
I could think of a solution where pg_hba.conf just
overrides the database table (so you have a starting
point with empty table and/or reentry in case of a
mistake)
regards
Tino
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James_Hughes | 2006-03-30 07:53:20 | Re: Initdb on Windows 2003 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-03-30 03:31:21 | Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL |