| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PL/Java Development <Pljava-dev(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Shared memory |
| Date: | 2006-03-28 19:21:11 |
| Message-ID: | 44298CA7.3030000@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pljava-dev |
Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> What exactly is a FENCED solution ? If it is simply a remote
> connection to a single JVM then pl-j already does that.
Last time I tried to use pl-j (in order to build a mutual test
platform), I didn't manage to make it compile due to missing artifacts
and it wasn't ported to Windows. Lazslo filed a JIRA bug on that but
since then (August last year) I've seen no activity in the project. Is
it still alive? Is anyone using it?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-03-28 19:38:27 | Re: Shared memory |
| Previous Message | Nichlas Löfdahl | 2006-03-28 19:21:01 | autovacuum: could not access status of transaction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-03-28 19:38:27 | Re: Shared memory |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-03-28 19:11:47 | Re: Shared memory |