| From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [postgis-users] Problem using set-returning functions |
| Date: | 2006-03-27 13:21:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4427E6C1.1000401@logix-tt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi, Regina,
Obe, Regina DND\MIS wrote:
> generate_series works I think because it is a special case - it isn't
> really a set function even though it behaves that way sortof.
Well, dump() works as well, and it is no build-in.
As a recent thread here stated, it is how set returning functions are
expected to work as long as "adjacent tables" are not implemented.
http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg20545.html
Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John DeSoi | 2006-03-27 13:32:39 | Re: Problem using set-returning functions |
| Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-03-27 10:41:32 | Problem using set-returning functions |