Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Joel Miller <joelwmiller(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync
Date: 2006-03-25 04:31:02
Message-ID: 4424C786.7090407@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> This whole discussion reminds me why we've stuck so fervently to
> bog-standard ANSI C for Postgres. There is a payoff for taking
> portability seriously. Too bad the original authors of cvsup were more
> interested in using a flavor-of-the-month programming language...

Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2006-03-25 04:32:08 Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-25 04:22:24 Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync