From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Joel Miller <joelwmiller(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |
Date: | 2006-03-25 04:31:02 |
Message-ID: | 4424C786.7090407@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> This whole discussion reminds me why we've stuck so fervently to
> bog-standard ANSI C for Postgres. There is a payoff for taking
> portability seriously. Too bad the original authors of cvsup were more
> interested in using a flavor-of-the-month programming language...
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-03-25 04:32:08 | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-25 04:22:24 | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |