Re: predicate locking knowledge

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: predicate locking knowledge
Date: 2006-03-23 19:16:33
Message-ID: 44229FB1.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 1:13 pm, in message
<44229EE6(dot)EE98(dot)0025(dot)0(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Kevin Grittner"
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

Attachment didn't seem to go through. Embedding below.

Index: mvcc.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml,v
retrieving revision 2.55
diff -c -r2.55 mvcc.sgml
*** mvcc.sgml 10 Mar 2006 19:10:48 -0000 2.55
--- mvcc.sgml 23 Mar 2006 18:58:13 -0000
***************
*** 471,477 ****
result in problems. (Certainly the example above is rather
contrived
and unlikely to represent real software.) Accordingly,
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> does not implement
predicate
! locking, and so far as we are aware no other production DBMS does
either.
</para>

<para>
--- 471,477 ----
result in problems. (Certainly the example above is rather
contrived
and unlikely to represent real software.) Accordingly,
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> does not implement
predicate
! locking.
</para>

<para>

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2006-03-23 19:27:45 Re: WIP: splitting BLCKSZ
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2006-03-23 19:13:10 predicate locking knowledge