From: | Jeffrey Melloy <jmelloy(at)visualdistortion(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jimbo1 <jamestheboarder(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Advantages of PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0 |
Date: | 2006-03-22 19:08:48 |
Message-ID: | 4421A0C0.5010902@visualdistortion.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jimbo1 wrote:
>Hello there,
>
>I'm a freelance Oracle Developer by trade (can almost hear the boos now
>;o)), and am looking into developing my own Snowboarding-related
>website over the next few years. Anyway, I'm making some decisions now
>about the site architecture, and the database I'm going to need is
>obviously included. If my site works out, I'm expecting reasonably
>heavy traffic, so want a database that I'm confident can cope with it.
>
>It is out of the question for me to use Oracle, although I am a
>(biased) 'fan' of that RDBMS. I definitely need to go for a cheaper
>route, and to that end I'm looking at either MySQL or PostgreSQL.
>
>Regarding MySQL, I've been put off by Oracle's recent purchase of
>InnoDB and realise this could badly impact the latest version of the
>MySQL database. I can almost hear Larry Ellison's laughter from here
>(allegedly)! I've also been put off by the heavy marketing propaganda
>on the MySQL website.
>
>
I use Oracle at work and PostgreSQL for personal projects, and I think you'll find that PostgreSQL is the more feature-complete (or "Oracle-like") database. There are definitely situations Oracle comes out ahead, but for a website I doubt you'll find them. Also, the syntax between the two is more closer to the standard (PostgreSQL is actually better in this) than MySQL. Postgres has Pl/PgSQL, which is close enough PlSQL to not cause any problems.
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-22 19:14:36 | Re: Old pg_xlog files |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2006-03-22 19:03:13 | Re: Old pg_xlog files |