Re: Future versions of psqlODBC

Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>>Sent: 22 March 2006 14:48
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Ludek Finstrle; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: [ODBC] Future versions of psqlODBC
>>
>>"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>>
>>
>>>We could just return to plain old psqlodbc/PostgreSQL ?
>>>
>>>
>>Please. This is going to be confusing enough anyway.
>>
>>Do you expect to resurrect the separate ANSI/Unicode driver versions
>>someday? If so, please consider making the build create both driver
>>names right away, even if there's not any distinction at the moment.
>>Otherwise you'll be creating useless thrash in the packaging and
>>people's odbcinst.ini files, as they have to change the driver name
>>only to have to change it again later.
>>
>>
>
>Hiroshi tells me we won't need two drivers and that the 07 branch should
>not suffer the problems we had with 08.00 that caused us to move back to
>two.
>

AFAIR I didn't tell you such a thing. Though I've heard no problem from
Japanese( e.g. about the
use with MS Access) so far , I don't know if it solves the problems
e.g. about BDE or under
other languages' environment.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue