From: | Wayne Schroeder <raz(at)positivenetworks(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Long running transactions |
Date: | 2006-03-21 00:25:23 |
Message-ID: | 441F47F3.1030207@positivenetworks.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have a quite heavily accessed database that is vacuumed nightly.
Attached to that database are processes, that at times, due to the way
they are coded, stay "idle in transaction" for long periods of time
(client lib implementation issues a BEGIN). I've been reading up on
XIDs and the like and I'm trying to determine if this is going to cause
problems.
The reason I ask is one of these processes blocked a slony replication
set from doing it's initial copy with a warning about an old transaction
id. It made me wonder if long running transactions could some how hurt
things in other areas. Obviously the slony copy is not an issue for the
postgres list -- I am more interested in the effects of long running
transactions in general.
Wayne
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-21 00:45:27 | Re: Long running transactions |
Previous Message | Murali K. Maddali | 2006-03-21 00:22:32 | xml output |