From: | Miguel <mmiranda(at)123(dot)com(dot)sv> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec |
Date: | 2006-03-20 21:12:37 |
Message-ID: | 441F1AC5.9050700@123.com.sv |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Luke Lonergan wrote:
>Miguel,
>
>On 3/20/06 12:52 PM, "Miguel" <mmiranda(at)123(dot)com(dot)sv> wrote:
>
>
>
>>i have a HP dl380 g3 with array 5i controlled (1+0), these are my results
>>
>>
>
>Another "known bad" RAID controller. The Smartarray 5i is horrible on Linux
>- this is the first BSD result I've seen.
>
>
>
>>Seek times:
>> Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.138232 sec = 4.553 msec
>> Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.084474 sec = 4.338 msec
>>
>>
>
>These seem OK - are they "access times" or are they actually "seek times"?
>
>
i dont know, how can i check?
>Transfer rates:
> outside: 102400 kbytes in 2.075984 sec = 49326 kbytes/sec
> middle: 102400 kbytes in 2.100510 sec = 48750 kbytes/sec
> inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.042313 sec = 50139 kbytes/sec
>
>
>is this good enough?
>It's pretty slow. How many disk drives do you have?
>
>
>
>
I have 6 ultra a320 72G 10k discs
---
Miguel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron | 2006-03-20 21:17:09 | Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance |
Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-03-20 20:59:13 | Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & |