| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |
| Date: | 2015-03-04 15:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | 4412.1425483139@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Another advantage of this is that it would probably make git less
> likely to fumble a rebase. If there are lots of places in the file
> where we have the same 10 lines in a row with occasional variations,
> rebasing a patch could easily pick the the wrong place to reapply the
> hunk.
That is a really, really good point.
I had been thinking it was a disadvantage of Andrew's proposal that
line breaks would tend to fall in inconsistent places from one entry
to another ... but from this perspective, maybe that's not such a
bad thing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-04 15:33:02 | Re: Weirdly pesimistic estimates in optimizer |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-04 15:25:58 | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |