Re: x206-x225

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "H(dot)J(dot) Sanders" <hjs(at)rmax(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: x206-x225
Date: 2006-03-10 13:40:22
Message-ID: 441181C6.3040401@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

H.J. Sanders wrote:
> X206 IBM X226
> ---------------------- -------------------
> processor Pentium 4 3.2
> Ghz Xeon 3.0 Ghz
> main memory 1.25
> GB 4 GB
> discs 2 x SCSI RAID1 10000RPM
> 1 x ATA 7200 RPM

Noting that the SCSI discs are on the *slower* machine.

> Time at X206 Time at X226
> -------------------- ------------------
> insert record (1 to 10000) 6 sec. 41 sec.
> select record (1 to 10000) 4 4
> delete record (1 to 10000) 6 41
>
>
> This is ofcourse a totally unexpected results (you should think off the
> opposite).

Your ATA disk is lying about disk caching being turned off. Assuming
each insert is in a separate transaction, then it's not going to do
10,000 / 6 = 1667 transactions/sec - that's faster than it's rotational
speed.

> Funny is that the select time is the same for both machines.

Because you're limited by the speed to read from RAM.

By the way - these sort of tests are pretty much meaningless in any
practical terms.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

  • x206-x225 at 2006-03-10 09:50:20 from H.J. Sanders

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2006-03-10 13:41:46 Re: Query time
Previous Message Ruben Rubio Rey 2006-03-10 11:52:41 Re: Query time