Re: PostgreSQL committer history?

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Date: 2006-03-09 19:51:07
Message-ID: 4410872B.9090107@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Neil Conway wrote:
>
> There's nothing stopping you -- most code review is done on
> pgsql-patches via email. If you or anyone else wants to contribute,
> please go right ahead -- participating in code review certainly doesn't
> require commit privileges.

I'm guessing that that's a good way for people to qualify for
a commit bit as well. If core sees someone making intelligent
sounding comments on patches across a wide area of the code, I
bet that'd go a long way to making them want to give the guy a
commit bit. Especially if (when a patch looked good) the reviewer
left subtle hints like "I'd check it in if I had a commit bit"
and if core agreed with the reviewer almost every time he said that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-03-10 01:16:20 Re: MySQL million tables
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-03-09 19:42:06 Re: PostgreSQL committer history?