| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
| Date: | 2006-03-09 19:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | 4410872B.9090107@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil Conway wrote:
>
> There's nothing stopping you -- most code review is done on
> pgsql-patches via email. If you or anyone else wants to contribute,
> please go right ahead -- participating in code review certainly doesn't
> require commit privileges.
I'm guessing that that's a good way for people to qualify for
a commit bit as well. If core sees someone making intelligent
sounding comments on patches across a wide area of the code, I
bet that'd go a long way to making them want to give the guy a
commit bit. Especially if (when a patch looked good) the reviewer
left subtle hints like "I'd check it in if I had a commit bit"
and if core agreed with the reviewer almost every time he said that.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-03-10 01:16:20 | Re: MySQL million tables |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-03-09 19:42:06 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |