From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
Date: | 2006-03-09 19:51:07 |
Message-ID: | 4410872B.9090107@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil Conway wrote:
>
> There's nothing stopping you -- most code review is done on
> pgsql-patches via email. If you or anyone else wants to contribute,
> please go right ahead -- participating in code review certainly doesn't
> require commit privileges.
I'm guessing that that's a good way for people to qualify for
a commit bit as well. If core sees someone making intelligent
sounding comments on patches across a wide area of the code, I
bet that'd go a long way to making them want to give the guy a
commit bit. Especially if (when a patch looked good) the reviewer
left subtle hints like "I'd check it in if I had a commit bit"
and if core agreed with the reviewer almost every time he said that.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-03-10 01:16:20 | Re: MySQL million tables |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-03-09 19:42:06 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |