Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, CG <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes
Date: 2006-03-03 19:58:05
Message-ID: 44089FCD.8070409@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephan Szabo wrote:

>On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>>The reason I'm hesitant to add a bunch more cross-type operators is
>>mainly that we have too darn many operators named "=" already. I've
>>seen in recent profiling tests that it's taking the parser a noticeable
>>amount of time to decide which one is meant.
>>

Speaking of parsers, did anyone else notice that gcc in its latest
release has ripped out the bison based parser for C and Objective-C in
favor of a hand cut RD parser?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-03-03 20:04:52 Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-03 19:47:42 Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?