Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost
Date: 2022-04-29 19:38:03
Message-ID: 440376.1651261083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> So perhaps we should do it more like the attached, which produces
> this plan for the UNION case:

sigh ... actually attached this time.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
change-cost_subqueryscan-rowcount-estimate-2.patch text/x-diff 2.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-04-29 20:08:09 Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-04-29 19:31:50 Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost