Re: Index not always being used

From: Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index not always being used
Date: 2019-08-29 14:22:36
Message-ID: 43ccec39-3be0-a47c-cd27-fff73d948f20@jakobs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi,

A good solution would be to add another B-Tree index. The planner would
choose this one in case of a search using "=" and the trigram index when
using "like", "similar to" or "~" (regexp).

A trigram index is not suitable for a "=" comparison.

Regards,

Holger

Am 29.08.19 um 16:15 schrieb John Scalia:
> I’ve got a table with approximately 5.5 million rows, and one column that is frequently searched is of type varchar(50) and we just put a trigram index on it. Now, if we search “where bld_city = ‘baskingridge’”, explain says a sequential table scan is going to be used, but if I change the query to use “where bold_city like ‘basking%’”, then explain correctly shows that a bitmap index scan will be performed. Why would these two forms use different approaches? I’m a bit confused.
> —
> Jay
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
--

Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach
instant messaging: xmpp:holger(at)jakobs(dot)com
+49 178 9759012 <tel:+491789759012> oder +49 2202 817157
<tel:+492202817157>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Scalia 2019-08-29 14:29:06 Re: Index not always being used
Previous Message John Scalia 2019-08-29 14:15:28 Index not always being used