pgAdmin3 fork/resurrection for PostgreSQL 10+ support

From: Sami Kuhmonen <sami(at)tokavuh(dot)com>
To: "pgadmin-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pgAdmin3 fork/resurrection for PostgreSQL 10+ support
Date: 2019-01-07 19:34:52
Message-ID: 43b62fa071c94d7e8e3003dc2f47c3b2@tokavuh.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

As far as I understood this would be the correct place to communicate about this.

Due to a lot of people missing the support for PostgreSQL 10+ in pgAdmin3 I have decided to resurrect the tool and add support for new versions to it. As far as I understand this is all fine licensing-wise and I have added a repository on GitHub for this and will be providing binaries at least for Windows. (https://github.com/Symbiatch/pgAdmin3)

I would still like to ask if there is any problem with this, should I somehow specifically note in the application that it is an unofficial fork of pgAdmin3, and whatever suggestions anyone would have for this situation. All advice is welcome.

--
Sami Kuhmonen
Tokavuh Technologies oy

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Akshay Joshi 2019-01-08 07:40:20 pgAdmin 4 commit: Fixed an issue while creating export job. Fixes #3856
Previous Message Anthony DeBarros 2019-01-07 14:46:58 Re: pgAdmin4 v4.0 candidate builds