| From: | Philippe Marzin <philippe(dot)marzin(at)free(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reliability recommendations |
| Date: | 2006-02-25 00:18:52 |
| Message-ID: | 43FFA26C.5020802@free.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Do you have a hw reference that runs that fast (5 x 30 = 150MB/s) ?
Luke Lonergan a écrit :
> Joshua,
>
> On 2/24/06 9:19 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> This machine... if you run it in raid 5 will only get 7-9 megabytes a
>> second READ! performance. That is with 6 SCSI drives.
>> If you run it in RAID 10 you get a more reasonable 50-55 megabytes per
>> second.
>>
>> I don't have it sitting in front of me or I would give you an exact
>> model number.
>>
>> This machine also uses the serverworks chipset which is known to be a
>> catastrophe.
>>
>
> I'd be more shocked if this weren't also true of nearly all SCSI HW RAID
> adapters of this era. If you had ordered an HP DL380 server you'd get about
> the same performance.
>
> BTW - I don't think there's anything reasonable about 50-55 MB/s from 6
> disks, I'd put the minimum for this era machine at 5 x 30 = 150MB/s.
>
> - Luke
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-02-25 00:29:55 | Re: Reliability recommendations |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-02-25 00:06:57 | Re: Reliability recommendations |