| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL ad images |
| Date: | 2006-02-17 16:37:56 |
| Message-ID: | 43F5FBE4.3010603@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> I believe there was some concern by some of the graphics donors about re-using
> the graphics in commercial products. I guess I would just wonder if we
> should refuse graphics that are not BSD licensed? If we make clear as to
> which license applies to which graphics, I think we should be open to
> accepting more than just BSD.
>
>
In the essence of keeping things simple. They should just be BSD licensed.
We are not in the business of keeping track of IP rights.
The only way to be sure would be to require a specific license.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
P.S. I actually don't care if they are BSD but I think they should be "1"
license.
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2006-02-17 16:47:13 | Elephant images |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-02-17 16:31:30 | Re: PostgreSQL ad images |