From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeremy Haile <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reliability recommendations |
Date: | 2006-02-15 18:05:05 |
Message-ID: | 43F36D51.5090502@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jeremy Haile wrote:
> We are a small company looking to put together the most cost effective
> solution for our production database environment. Currently in
> production Postgres 8.1 is running on this machine:
>
> Dell 2850
> 2 x 3.0 Ghz Xeon 800Mhz FSB 2MB Cache
> 4 GB DDR2 400 Mhz
> 2 x 73 GB 10K SCSI RAID 1 (for xlog and OS)
> 4 x 146 GB 10K SCSI RAID 10 (for postgres data)
> Perc4ei controller
>
> The above is a standard Dell box with nothing added or modified beyond
> the options available directly through Dell.
You should probably review the archives for PostgreSQL user
experience with Dell's before you purchase one.
> I sent our scenario to our sales team at Dell and they came back with
> all manner of SAN, DAS, and configuration costing as much as $50k.
>
HAHAHAHAHA.... Don't do that. Dell is making the assumption
you won't do your homework. Make sure you cross quote with IBM,
Compaq and Penguin Computing...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2006-02-15 18:17:35 | Re: Reliability recommendations |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-02-15 17:38:17 | Re: out of memory |