From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Search machine is ready |
Date: | 2006-02-14 21:38:26 |
Message-ID: | 43F24DD2.20203@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
>
I am forwarding this to pgsql-www as it really is a community decision.
>
> On 14/2/06 18:00, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> To setup user accounts, to install/upgrade PostgreSQL/Aspseek/apache, to
>> Well you shouldn't need root access for any of that. Nor should you be
>> upgrading anything but Aspseek. If we need something upgrading we will
>> gladly handle it.
>>
>>> fix things when they go wrong... We will continue to run and manage
>>> things on a day to day basis, just with Command Prompt as backup.
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought this was a dedicated machine?
>> It is a dedicated machine. We don't allow root access to anyone on any
>> of the machines we host, regardless if it is dedicated.
>>
>> This way we don't get weird things like people not knowing "who"
>> installed an alpha version of mailman (like on pgFoundry).
>>
>> Our experience shows that if you think you need root access, chances
>> are you don't. From your above requirements, you don't need root access.
>>
>> You do need some group perms setup, sudo ability to a couple of
>> administrative commands.
>>
>> I know this is a little different then how the community is used to
>> working but we have a solid track record and this is one of the reasons.
>
> Hi Joshua,
>
> You are right that what you are proposing is not the way we are used to
> working, and having consulted with the other admins in the community
> (specifically Marc and Magnus), we agree that we do not want to change the
> way we work and have to rely on people that we don't know, and have no
> intimate knowledge of our requirements or systems in a time when we might
> need almost instant response in the middle of the night.
>
> We would be prepared to compromise and be restricted to root control of a VM
> if you're prepared to setup the box as a Linux Vserver however. That would
> ensure that only your staff have control over the host OS, allowing them to
> support the system and network etc, but give us the control we require over
> the software we run.
>
> Regards, Dave
Well John Hansen didn't have a problem with it and has already begun
work. I have also already stated that we can make sure that you actually
have access to what you "need" to operate the environment.
Your requirements as listed above distinctly note a lack of a need for
root access. Thus I really don't know what your concern is outside of a
feeling that you need "control".
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-14 21:56:28 | Re: Search machine is ready |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-14 20:31:21 | Re: [pgsql-www] missing 8.1.2 release notes |