From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Date: | 2006-02-14 21:17:57 |
Message-ID: | 43F24905.9010401@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>Finally, several of the patches committed the last few days have been
>fixing minor bugs or platform specific issues with various patches. One
>thing that would be really nice is a real patch queue and have the
>buildfarm machines occasionally apply one of the patches and try to run
>with it. For people that don't have access to all sorts of
>architechtures, it would be a great way of getting feedback on the
>portability of the patch prior to actual submission to -HEAD.
>
>
>
This would probably be fairly trivial to arrange. There is nothing
magical about the branches we build against on buildfarm - it just
happens to be HEAD and the REL_foo_STABLE branches. They are just names
in a config file.
If I had enough time there are all sorts of things like this I'd love to
set up. A fetchable url that says "try these experimental CVS branches"
or something like that would be great.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-02-14 21:54:12 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-14 21:00:50 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Klosterman | 2006-02-14 21:35:28 | Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl |
Previous Message | Andrew Klosterman | 2006-02-14 21:15:17 | Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl |