Re: Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart?

From: Leonel Nunez <lnunez(at)enelserver(dot)com>
To: Stefan Arentz <stefan(dot)arentz(at)norad(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart?
Date: 2006-02-11 17:46:45
Message-ID: 43EE2305.8060508@enelserver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stefan Arentz wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm looking at the design for an application where i have to store
> potentially many gigabytes worth of small blobs of varying sizes (8K -
> 64K) in a database. I've always been told that it is smarter to store
> references to files in the database, and I think that is true in a lot
> of cases. But here I need this data to be transactional and probably
> replicated so I'm looking into storing it directly in the db.
>
> I know this is all rather vague but I'm interested in more experienced
> pgsql user's opinions about this. Is it smart? Would it work? Or would
> something like this blow up the db?
>
> S.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>

well I store images and other files on the Database with ByteA
fields works great

leonel

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2006-02-11 17:50:31 Re: Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart?
Previous Message Stefan Arentz 2006-02-11 17:41:08 Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart?