Re: Why pg_hba not in table?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jason C(dot) Leach" <jason(dot)leach(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why pg_hba not in table?
Date: 2006-02-07 18:00:30
Message-ID: 43E8E03E.20308@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jason C. Leach wrote:

>hi,
>
>Why not put pg_hba.conf in a pg table? Seems like it would be much
>easier to work with. After all, if we can keep users in the db
>tables, why not this?
>
>
Go for it! It is actually on the TODO.

Joshua D. Drake

>Thanks,
>J.
>
>--
>........................................
>.... Jason C. Leach
>.... PGP Key: 0x62DDDF75
>.... Keyserver: gpg.mit.edu
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad Nicholson 2006-02-07 18:34:06 Re: Syncing Databases Weekly
Previous Message Jason C. Leach 2006-02-07 17:54:20 Why pg_hba not in table?