From: | Hari Warrier <hbhaskaran(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ralph Mason <ralph(dot)mason(at)telogis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index Usage using IN |
Date: | 2006-02-01 22:12:54 |
Message-ID: | 43E13266.2090101@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Select ID from TableA where not exists ( Select ID from Table B where ID
= TableA.ID)
might give you index scan. Of course, that is only useful is TableA is
very small table.
Not appropriate for 250k rows
on 2/1/2006 12:12 PM Ralph Mason said the following:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 tables both have an index on ID (both ID columns are an oid).
>
> I want to find only only rows in one and not the other.
>
> Select ID from TableA where ID not IN ( Select ID from Table B)
>
> This always generates sequential scans.
>
> Table A has about 250,000 rows. Table B has about 250,000 Rows.
>
> We should get a Scan on Table B and a Index Lookup on Table A.
>
> Is there any way to force this? enable_seqscan off doesn't help at all.
>
> The Plan is
>
> Seq Scan on tablea(cost=100000000.00..23883423070450.96 rows=119414
> width=4)
> Filter: (NOT (subplan))"
> SubPlan -> Seq Scan on tableb (cost=100000000.00..100004611.17
> rows=242617 width=4)
>
>
> Thanks
> Ralph
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-02-02 04:47:09 | Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2006-02-01 21:37:07 | Re: [PERFORM] Default autovacuum settings too conservative |