From: | Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-odbc(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ODBC and pgpool |
Date: | 2006-02-01 11:21:02 |
Message-ID: | 43E0999E.7281D1F@telemetry.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Many thanks. Not the most desirable situation but at least it's a clear answer.
My current situation is that I'm using Delphi on the clients, this has
data-aware components that adopt undefined (or at the very least inconvenient
:-) states when no longer connected to the underlying database. However I have
aother reasons to want to discard these, so this becomes just one more factor to
consider in the redesign.
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > If a Win-32 system connects via ODBC to pgpool, does the system
> > running pgpool have to be permanently running or can it be rebooted
> > without deranging open but quiescent connections?
>
> No, your application will have to be able to reconnect if the connection
> is lost by reason of the "server" disappearing or having been moved.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben Trewern | 2006-02-01 11:28:46 | Re: ODBC and pgpool |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-01 07:30:42 | Re: ODBC and pgpool |