From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: autovacuum and temporary tables |
Date: | 2006-01-20 15:05:29 |
Message-ID: | 43D0FC39.6070704@zeut.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Exactly which version of 8.0.x? There was a bug fixed around 8.0.5 or
so "Prevent core dump in contrib version of autovacuum when a table has
been dropped. Per report from daveg (not his patch, though)."
The version of autovacuum in 8.1 is a fairly different beast than the
contrib version, and since it was integrated, I think all of Tom's
concerns were dealt with. I highly recommend the 8.1 version over the
contrib version for many reason.
Matt
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a postgres 8.0 installation, and I'm running autovacuum against
> it. I have noticed that it processes temporary tables too, which is in
> itself a bit curious, but the problem is that autovacuum might even
> crash if a temporary table is suddenly gone while it tries to vacuum
> it... that's what happened once here. I'm not sure what are the
> necessary conditions to trigger this, it only happened once.
>
> I searched in the release notes and googled a bit, but could not
> (quickly) find what's the status of autovacuum vs. temporary tables in
> 8.1. I have seen that that was one of Tom's outstanding issues with
> autovacuum to be included in the core, but was this resolved ?
>
> Thanks,
> Csaba.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-01-20 15:09:57 | Re: Create User |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-20 14:56:04 | Re: Initdb panic: invalid record offset at 0/0 creating template1] |