| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? |
| Date: | 2006-01-19 16:03:03 |
| Message-ID: | 43CFB837.4090104@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> lc_collate | C
>> lc_ctype | C
>
> OK, scratch that theory. Don't suppose you can create a reproducible
> test case ;-)
That may be a bit tough... What really struck me is that the
duplication only occurs in this set of 100 tables and the
duplication is always violating the same index. We currently
have 4-5 tables that are in violation.
Let me see what I can do to duplicate this.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2006-01-19 16:11:04 | Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-19 15:43:07 | Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? |