Re: Infrastructure monitoring

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring
Date: 2006-01-15 21:04:20
Message-ID: 43CAB8D4.4060700@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
> Hello,
> ...
> Why do we "need" a separate server for the cgi's? Are they that hard on
> the webserver?

Maybe not using cgi would help? You can run webapp and postgres on the
same server but putting them on separate servers really helps with
having performance high. But it really depends on the application.

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2006-01-15 21:08:53 Re: Infrastructure monitoring
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-01-15 20:47:16 Re: Infrastructure monitoring