From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Plans for 8.2? |
Date: | 2006-01-13 23:00:23 |
Message-ID: | 43C83107.4070104@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:39:06PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Easy everyone. Let's not bite the newcomers too hard here.
>>
>>> 2. Define "endorse". Does that mean "in the backend"? So
>>> everyone has to pay the performance penalty even though they won't
>>> all use it? Even though no other database system makes you make that
>>> compromise?
>> I would presume that at least packaged with PG (in the contrib section)
>> would be a good start. A prominent, east to find link to Slony on
>> the website would help too.
>
> Why just Slony? There's at least 2 other free replication solutions I
> can think of off the top of my head, and I'm sure I'm missing some.
Slony is the only free OSS postgreSQL replication solution that I would
ever suggest to someone.
However if the project is going to start suggesting replication
solutions it should suggest all of them.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-01-13 23:15:23 | Re: Plans for 8.2? |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-13 22:55:16 | Re: Unable to connect to a dabase |