| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Milen Kulev <makulev(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG process architecture |
| Date: | 2006-01-11 16:02:17 |
| Message-ID: | 43C52C09.6040806@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Milen Kulev wrote:
>Hi Harris,
>from oracle DBA point of view Enterprise DB is VERY cool. My boss will be
>very happy to hear that there a way to get (paid) support for a PG DB.
>
>
There several highly qualified support vendors for PostgreSQL:
SRA America
Pervasive
and ourselves, the only dedicated PostgreSQL support vendor; Command Prompt.
>But at the end I want to undestand how PG (and its clone Enterprise DB )
>is working ;) .
>
EnterpriseDB is not a clone, it is a fork. That said, it is very cool
that they
have created an Oracle look-a-like for much less but if you want PostgreSQL
that isn't EnterpriseDB.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-01-11 16:10:47 | FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD |
| Previous Message | Milen Kulev | 2006-01-11 15:38:34 | Re: PG process architecture |