Supplemental contrib docs (was: [GENERAL] DBlink documentation)

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
>>>Makefiles don't install them either.
>>>
>>>It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
>>>to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to
>>>forestall name conflicts?
>
>>While I'm messing with dblink, did you want me to do anything WRT this?
>
> I don't think we settled on what we want to do yet. Any thoughts?
>
> I'm kind of leaning toward the subdirectory idea myself...

(I removed GENERAL, and added DOCS to the distribution of this thread)

Well I like {prefix}/doc given that's how dblink is already set up ;-)

Questions:
- Do we want a naming convention for the files in
{prefix}/doc?
- Do we pre-create {prefix}/doc for every contrib
directory in advance?

I think the answers are no, and yes, but I don't feel strongly about either.

Joe