| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andre Truter <linux(at)trusoft(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Subject: | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
| Date: | 2006-01-03 23:52:24 |
| Message-ID: | 43BB0E38.1050602@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>
>>I'm happy to lump all the docs back into the README if that's what you
>>want, but I split it up in the first place because it was getting very long.
>
> No, I'm not really proposing that we force all contrib modules to have
> only a README. I'm just annoyed by the lack of consistency (dblink/doc
> versus tsearch2/docs, and some of the other modules seem to have some
> doc files just loose in their top directory).
>
> It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
> Makefiles don't install them either.
>
> It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
> to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to
> forestall name conflicts?
>
While I'm messing with dblink, did you want me to do anything WRT this?
Thanks,
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-03 23:56:37 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-03 02:04:50 | Re: CONSTRAINT syntax in ALTER TABLE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-03 23:56:37 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-01-03 23:19:12 | Re: generic way to retrieve array as rowset |