From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? |
Date: | 2006-01-02 18:33:39 |
Message-ID: | 43B97203.1010302@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Is there any way to find out $subject? I see that several of the
> buildfarm machines are choking on a patch I committed yesterday:
>
> guc-file.l: In function `ProcessConfigFile':
> guc-file.l:162: error: `YY_FLUSH_BUFFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> guc-file.l:162: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> guc-file.l:162: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[4]: *** [guc.o] Error 1
>
> YY_FLUSH_BUFFER is documented as a standard macro in bison 1.875, which
> is the oldest version we officially support. But I'm prepared to change
> it if there is another way that would work with a wider range of bison
> versions.
I just verified that -HEAD is broken on Debian Sarge 3.1 (nearly all of
the failing buildfarm members are Debian Sarge 3.1 boxes) - and I just
verified the Problem exists on i386 too.
The version of bison available on Debian Sarge reports as:
bison (GNU Bison) 1.875d
Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman.
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-02 18:33:58 | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-01-02 18:30:12 | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? |