Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
Cc: "j(dot)random(dot)programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Date: 2005-12-21 12:41:30
Message-ID: 43A94D7A.8010702@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Csaba Nagy wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>Another possible mapping would be to/from a Java boolean array. This has
>>the problem that a Java array of booleans passed to setObject() should
>>probably be mapped to an array of booleans on the server side, not to a
>>bit(n) type.
>
>
> What about a java.util.BitSet ? Or does it have to extend PGObject ?

BitSet would work. The only real reason to extend PGobject is so you can
implement support for extra types without modifying the driver itself.

-O

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Averbukh Stella 2005-12-21 19:20:54 java.sql.BatchUpdateException
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2005-12-21 09:59:06 Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle